leolintang/iStock(NEW HAVEN, Conn.) — Investigators are looking into a fire set at a Connecticut mosque as a possible arson attack.The blaze was reported at the Diyanet Mosque in New Haven on Sunday.“In conducting the investigation, we’ve detected that there is intent in this fire. This was intentionally set,” New Haven Fire Department chief John Alston said at a news conference Monday.The local chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CT) released a statement saying that the fire started on the building’s first floor and spread up to the second level. The building is currently under construction, the statement said.“Given recent attacks on houses of worship in this country and around the world, it is incumbent on law enforcement authorities to investigate the possibility of a bias motive for this arson,” said Tark Aouadi, the executive director of CAIR-CT. Mosques have been the target of recent attacks, including a fire set at a mosque in Escondido, Calif., in March that officials have since tied to the suspect in the shooting in April at a San Diego synagogue.The incident also comes in the wake of multiple attacks against houses of worship that have targeted multiple faiths. In March, attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, killed more than 50 people. There has also been a string of fires set at historically black churches in Louisiana.This most recent incident unfolded Sunday afternoon, with calls coming into the fire department shortly after 2:00 p.m.Alston said that while it wasn’t immediately clear if anyone was inside, first responders were able to confirm that everyone was out of the building.He said that the building is currently uninhabitable and the investigation is underway. As is customary in cases involving arson at houses of worship, the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, as well as state and local officials, are involved in the investigation, Alston said.Alston would not reveal what piece of evidence indicated that the fire was intentionally set, but he did reiterate that investigators believe that to be the case.There is a reward for up to $2,500 for information leading to an arrest, conviction, or prevention of arson fire.“I find an attack like this is especially hurtful and hateful when you attack an institution for what people believe, when you attack a religious house of worship,” Gov. Ned Lamont said at Monday’s news conference.Lamont said that he has spoken with the mosque’s Imam who said that other houses of worship have offered to help, especially as Muslims celebrate the holy month of Ramadan.“What I heard here from the folks at this mosque is, they welcome the help but they want to worship right here at this place, and we’re going to do everything we can to make that possible,” he said. Copyright © 2019, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.
Jennifer Kovalevich/iStockBy ALEXANDER MALLIN, ABC NEWS(WASHINGTON) — President Donald Trump’s repeated threats to formally designate antifa as a terrorist group have generated new questions about the nature of the movement and how, or even whether, officials could clearly define members of what has been described by experts as more of an ideology than an organization.“It’s not one specific organization with a headquarters and a president and a chain of command,” said Mark Bray, a history professor at Rutgers University and author of “The Anti-Fascist Handbook.” “It’s a kind of politics. In a sense, there are plenty of antifa groups, but antifa itself is not a group.”That description is largely in line with how federal law enforcement has interpreted the antifa movement, leading up to this week’s protests, which in certain instances have devolved into violence, looting and vandalism. Experts on antifa, which is shorthand for “anti-fascism,” say the movement originates with groups that opposed World War II-era dictators like Italy’s Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler.While Attorney General William Barr in a statement Sunday denounced “violence instigated and carried out by antifa and other similar groups,” the Justice Department as of Wednesday has not made public direct evidence showing widespread involvement by avowed antifa supporters in instigating the violent scenes that have unfolded throughout the U.S.In the several federal cases brought thus far against those involved in riots or arsons, antifa has not yet been cited as among the affiliations or inspirations of the individuals charged.In an appearance before the Senate last year, FBI Director Christopher Wray was pressed as to why federal agents haven’t sought to mount an organized crime investigation of antifa related to its members’ attacks at rallies and other alleged criminal acts.“For us, antifa we view as more of an ideology than an organization,” Wray said. “We have quite a number though, I should tell you, of properly predicated investigations of what we categorize as ‘anarchist extremists,’ people who are trying to commit violent, criminal activity that violates federal law, and some of those people do subscribe to what we would describe as — to what we would refer to as kind of an antifa-like ideology.”Though the FBI has said it is seeking information on “violent instigators who are exploiting legitimate, peaceful protests and engaging in violations of federal law,” it has not issued a public statement since the start of the national unrest singling out antifa.Antifa movements in the U.S. can be traced back as early as the 1970s, according to historians, but Bray writes in his book that the Anti-Racist Action (ARA) groups in the late 1980s and 1990s — with their actions to directly confront racists, neo-Nazis and white supremacists and stymie their recruitment efforts — were the primary precursors for antifa in its current iteration.While antifa’s political leanings are often described as “far-left,” experts say members’ radical views vary and can intersect with communism, socialism and anarchism.Antifa has attracted more public attention in recent years both in the U.S. and abroad for its militant followers’ provocations and, in some cases, violent attacks at political rallies and protests.“Essentially there’s this belief that the only way to prevent fascism from rising and taking charge is to combat those who support fascism, physically and often in the street,” said Oren Segal, the vice president of the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League. “There’s a lot of people who don’t like Nazis and fascists — most people I would argue. What makes [antifa] different is that there are some guiding principles, if you will, and that’s the concept of, you know, a physical confrontation in order to combat a fascist.”A 2018 Congressional Research Service report outlined four “obligations” that antifa groups typically encourage of their followers, including, “(1) track the activity of fascist groups, (2) oppose their public organizing, (3) support antifascist allies attacked by fascists or arrested by police, and (4) not cooperate with law enforcement.”“Antifa followers tend not to accept that the conventional capacities of American society will thwart the rise of fascist movements,” the report says. “They lack faith in the ability of federal, state, or local governments to properly investigate or prosecute fascists who break the law, especially during shows of force at public marches.”Perhaps the most famous confrontation came during 2017’s Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va., when violence erupted between white nationalists, neo-Nazis and counter protesters, which included some supporters of antifa.President Trump’s first public mention of antifa came just two weeks after the rally as he faced major backlash over his response to the protests and the killing of Heather Heyer by an avowed neo-Nazi.“You know, they show up in the helmets and the black masks, and they’ve got clubs and they’ve got everything — antifa!” Trump said during a campaign rally that month.In the two years since, antifa supporters have engaged in similar skirmishes typically targeting far-right or alt-right protests at Berkeley, California, Stone Mountain, Georgia, and Portland, Oregon, among other cities.But antifa supporters’ activities are far from restricted to political rallies, Bray said.“Most of what they do entails researching who far-right groups are, figuring out who their leaders are and notifying their employers and their communities,” Bray said. “So it’s a lot of a kind of private investigator work that sometimes spills out into the streets with confrontations.”Even as antifa has generated an increasing amount of attention and scrutiny in recent years, Bray said its lack of an official structure makes it difficult to estimate how many Americans it might count among its “members,” who are mostly spread out across secretive local chapters.“These groups tend to be very small, in large part because they’re concerned about infiltration from law enforcement or the far right,” Bray said. “Some groups don’t even allow new members in order to prevent that, and the ones that do heavily vet the new members over the course of months and years to make sure that they have a full commitment, just to keep the numbers small.”Such an approach, though, has created opportunities that groups opposed to antifa can try to exploit. Just this week, Twitter moved to disable an account that appeared to represent a violent antifa group after it was determined to be a front account for a white nationalist group. Prior to being taken down, U.S. law enforcement had called out the group specifically as an example of a left-wing group trying to incite violence.Bray said, however, that he believes that the president’s efforts to try and attribute the violence and looting around the country almost exclusively to antifa vastly overstates both the membership numbers and capabilities of its followers.“It seems like a rather transparent attempt for him to deflect away from the underlying white supremacy behind the murder of George Floyd,” Bray said. “That’s not to say that there aren’t members of antifa groups participating in the various aspects of these protests, but their numbers are so minuscule nationally that they wouldn’t even be able to logistically do nearly as much as he’s blaming them for.”Copyright © 2020, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.